At the recent GRA State Convention, GRA President Nathaniel Darnell presented a list of legislative goals for the up-coming session as well as long-term goals for future of the Republican Party. We heard an instructive panel on Citizen Advocacy from Rhonda Thomas with Truth in Education, Election Integrity guru Jason Frazier, and SEGRA attorney Jerilyn Gibbs.
Voter GA‘s Garland and Tamara Favorito gave a report on the latest good news for Election Integrity Reform.
Finally, we received an excellent update from the attorneys assisting in the litigation for the Catoosa GOP’s “freedom of association” case to protect the “R” primary ballot from fake Republicans.
Now you can watch the video of all the presentations given at that convention, including the following:
GRA President’s ReportPanel on Citizen LobbyingPanel on Catoosa Case
We’re disappointed to see Democrats win races we should never be losing — but we’re also grateful for the Republican victories that were secured.
Here’s the honest takeaway:
When grassroots conservatives show up early, organize locally, and stay involved between elections, we win. When we don’t, the Left fills the vacuum — and we all pay the price.
So no doom-and-gloom today. Just determination.
Below are FOUR important updates (a quick read), plus simple action steps to take right now.
THE GA GOP “SURVEY” LINK WAS PULLED, RE-POSTED — AND RESULTS WERE RELEASED WITHOUT THE REAL SUBSTANCE
In response to our last email, the “advisory committee” that published the survey took it down and replaced it with a new link.
Initially, I believed the purpose of the survey was to gather information to help the elected State Committee do its job between conventions, so issues could be debated at multiple business meetings with full discussion.
But the survey was taken down to avoid hearing your thoughts/opinions. And results were later released WITHOUT the written commentary that actually explains WHY ideas are good or bad (here is the link to the “results”), and what the real impacts/drawbacks would be (such as those described, partially, in the last e-mail). Even worse, the last State Committee business meeting appeared to be shut down in a way that avoided discussion of issues State Committee members were trying to raise.
If we want better outcomes, we have to insist on transparent process — and refuse to be managed by “feedback” that’s reduced to first impressions and stripped of context.
GA GOP ENDORSED BY PUTTING OUT A MAILER SUPPORTING A CANDIDATE IN A CONTESTED FULTON COUNTY MUNICIPAL RACE — WITHOUT A VOTE — AND THAT’S A PROBLEM
Recently, the Georgia Republican Party endorsed in a contested Fulton County municipal race where multiple Republicans were running. This mailer from the Georgia Republican Party states:
“The Georgia Republican Party is encouraging citizens to support its endorsed candidates for statewide office, including the Public Service Commission, and to stay in engaged in local city elections… Make a plan to get out and vote to reelect John Bradberry.”
That’s the exact opposite of how you keep volunteers energized.
Compare that with the Georgia Republican Assembly (GRA): • Members vote on endorsements. • A 2/3 vote at an endorsement convention is required to earn endorsement. • The process is driven by active grassroots conservatives — not backroom decisions.
When endorsements happen without buy-in, you alienate the very volunteers who knock doors, make calls, give money, and deliver margins — and that helps us lose elections.
2026 STATEWIDE PRIMARIES ARE ALREADY TAKING SHAPE — SLOW DOWN AND CHOOSE WISELY
Statewide primary races for next year have begun.
Good news: the GA GOP Executive Committee voted to ban Geoff Duncan from qualifying as a Republican — and he is now campaigning as a Democrat (where he belongs).
Bottom line: don’t let anyone pressure you into early endorsements. Do your homework. Wait for proven, principled Republicans.
One of the best tools for cutting through the noise is seeing who GRA members vote to endorse at our endorsement convention early next year. If you want a vote in that process, and want to be a part of the only Republican group the liberals at the AJC *and* the GAGOP Establishment are continuously attacking, apply to join the Georgia Republican Assembly now: www.GeorgiaRA.com
GAGOP ASSISTANT SECRETARY RESIGNED — AND THE REPLACEMENT PROCESS NEEDS SUNLIGHT
That position is being filled by a vote of the GAGOP Executive Committee later this month. We are told the top three finalists are being chosen TODAY, Friday, December 19, 2025, with voting beginning at 5:00 PM and ending at 9:00 PM.
Because there does not appear to be a clearly published, transparent process, you should immediately contact your Executive Committee members and tell them: • if you want to run (and ask how to submit your name), and/or • who you want them to vote for.
On Saturday GRA members learned from an insightful panel on “Citizen Lobbying,” which included Truth In Education‘s Rhonda Thomas, Election Integrity guru Jason Frazier from Fulton, and attorney Jerilyn Gibbs from Chatham.
We also heard an encouraging report on “The Latest & Greatest on Election Integrity Reform” from Garland & TamaraFavorito with VoterGA!
Lois Finlay, the new 2nd Vice President
Finally, we heard an update on the Catoosa County Republican Party case to uphold the GOP’s 1st Amendment right to “Freedom of Association” so that party organization can keep RINO candidates from qualifying in primaries. This update was provided by the three attorneys who have been working on the case: Catherine Bernard, David Oles, & Alex Johnson.
Two New Officers Elected!
Congratulations to the GRA officers who were elected or re-elected during the convention! They included the following:
• GRA President: Nathaniel Darnell • GRA Treasurer: Banks Wise • GRA Junior NFRA Director: Abigail Darnell • GRA 2nd Vice President: Lois Finlay • GRA 3rd Vice President: Cindy Panos
Tunnel Hill, GA – Saturday the GRA State Convention overwhelmingly passed two resolutions. The first one opposed the concept of Physician Assisted Suicide which State Rep. Sharon Cooper (R-Cobb) considered in a hearing for her Public Health Committee earlier this year. This new program called “Medical Aid in Dying” would involve a patient receiving a lethal prescription from his or her physician. This is morally abhorrent and a slippery slope to non-voluntary lethal prescriptions, also known as euthanasia. Public campaign disclosures show that Rep. Cooper receives a good deal of financing from Big Pharma.
You can see the final version of the resolution, which the GRA membership passed here:
Garland & Tamara Favorito speak at the convention.
The second resolution passed affirmed support for the decriminalization of midwifery in Georgia. It stated: “GRA principles include support for free enterprise and the elimination of ‘intrusive government intervention in the marketplace’… and it is not the proper role of government to interfere or restrict a woman’s liberty to make decisions regarding where she gives birth or with whom she contracts to assist her in the birth of her baby[.]”
Many other states allow for midwives to practice freely, as they have successfully for the vast majority of human history all over the world, but in Georgia state law makes it very burdensome for midwives to be able to serve expectant mothers who wish to give birth at home rather than in a hospital. Once again, Big Pharma appears to want to maintain a corporate monopoly over this medical practice.
You can see the text of the final version of the resolution that passed in support of midwifery here:
Carrolton, GA – On Thursday the State Ethics Commission unjustly found “reasonable grounds” to hold the GRA, Inc. responsible for the alleged failure of the GRA-PAC officer Brant Frost V to file required campaign finance reports.
Attorney Catherine Bernard represented the GRA.
“There is no mention of the GRA-PAC in GRA Bylaws,” Bernard argued. “There was no actual authority for GRA, Inc. or any of its officers to direct the activities of GRA PAC – that would be the necessary finding in order for there to be reasonable grounds to proceed against the GRA, Inc. as an organization. There was no possession of authority to direct.”
“…and it’s not because we haven’t seen the evidence. We have seen the evidence. The evidence is in the form of bylaws, corporate registration, and actual financial donations that have been made… there are relationships, certainly, but there is not possession of authority to direct the activities that would allow this commission to find that somehow the GRA should have registered the GRA PAC as an independent committee, or filed these disclosure reports that are outlined in the notice of violations.”
Three GRA officers attended the hearing.
Timothy Baywall, attorney for the ethics commission, said there is commission precedent where the commission held two entities responsible for the same offense, in a case related to the New Georgia Project, Inc. and the New Georgia Project Action, Inc. but he admitted “they both operated out of the same bank account” — which was never the case with the GRA and the GRA-PAC.
The hearing on Thursday was the first time that attorney Baywall presented arguments and evidence explaining why he believed the GRA, Inc. had such a close connection as to suggest some responsibility for the alleged failures of the PAC officer. Normally, in a court of law, both sides are required to present their arguments in advance of a hearing, so that both sides have the opportunity to prepare a response, but no such advance explanation was provided to the GRA prior to the hearing. The only presentation that was provided in advance was the allegations of the PAC officer’s failure to file correctly. This meant that Bernard had to form an answer very quickly.
While attorney Baywall was allowed to talk for over two hours, attorney Catherine Bernard was only able to speak for less than 50 minutes — often being interrupted with hostile questions from the panel and responses from Baywall — as the panel reminded her that they were eager to break for lunch.
Baywall did not present any evidence of the Georgia Republican Assembly, Inc. or its officers making any motions exercising authority or directing the GRA PAC, even after the GRA, Inc. had been extremely transparent and provided the commission with copious amounts of data, as they requested.
Baywall presented emails and public posts showing relationship between the two entities and then showed that both organizations at certain times shared some overlapping officers. Even though Baywall acknowledges that at least some of these overlapping officers were only “honorary,” he did not acknowledge that all of them may have been merely honorary, nor did he show evidence of any GRA PAC meeting where those supposedly overlapping officers were given the opportunity to vote to approve any actions by the PAC.
But even if overlapping officers suggests association, and association proves jurisdiction, then under that theory, the GAGOP should also be added to the complaint since six of the ten executive officers of the GRA during the last year also served on the GAGOP state committee. This theory is ridiculous since the bylaws of the Georgia Republican Party nowhere mention the GRA. The fact that a few officers (or even possibly a majority of the GRA officers) overlap with the GAGOP state committee does not give the GAGOP any “controlling interest” over the GRA nor does it give the GRA controlling interest over the GAGOP. They remain two separate entities, and, so it is with the GRA, Inc. and the GRA PAC.
“The entire time the Frosts ran the PAC,” said GRA President Nathaniel Darnell, “they insisted to us that since they gave the most money to the PAC, they had the controlling interest over the PAC’s decisions. We were not given any opportunity to override them.”
Nor does merely giving money to help a candidate get elected show that an entity is a PAC or an independent committee. There are many corporations throughout Georgia, such as Home Depot and Coca-Cola, which give political donations through one mechanism or another to candidates, politicians, and other political entities that promote them, and yet no one accuses them of operating a PAC.
At one point, Baywall even incorrectly claimed that GRA President Nathaniel Darnell had signed a check to the GRA PAC, even though the signature did not at all resemble Darnell’s and even though Baywall showed examples of Darnell’s signature that should have made it obvious. Moreover, the date of the check corresponded to the time that Nate Porter served as GRA Treasurer, and appears to have been his signature.
Baywall presented evidence of numerous campaign mailers that were funded by the GRA PAC, but many of these mailers had never before been seen by the three GRA, Inc. officers present at the meeting. They were seen for the first time that day, during the hearing.
“I had no clue the GRA PAC paid for mailers for Jeff Jones, or Emory Dunahoo, or some of the other candidates they showed in the meeting,” said GRA officer Abigail Darnell. “I certainly never was given an opportunity to vote on such expenditures in my four years serving on the GRA Executive Committee.”
“Why would the commission hold me responsible for accurate reporting of GRA-PAC expenditures when I didn’t even know about the existence of those expenditures until today?”
Furthermore, it was acknowledged during the hearing that the GRA PAC did not exclusively fund GRA endorsees, although they often overlapped. Many times it was only the West GA RA chapter, which was controlled by the Frost family, that endorsed a candidate, and the state GRA organization made no vote or decision on those endorsements. If the two entities were “one in the same,” as Baywall suggested, one would expect to see exclusivity. Also, many of the campaign mailers paid for by the GRA PAC that were submitted in the evidence did not include the GRA logo or any mention of the Georgia Republican Assembly on them.
“My responsibilities as Secretary of the GRA are defined in the Bylaws of GRA Inc” said Joanna Hildreth. “It is inaccurate and unjust for the commission to suggest that I had responsibility to provide oversight to another legal entity other than the Georgia Republican Assembly Inc.”
Baywall also presented a communication in which the GRA, Inc. referred to the GRA-PAC as a “partner organization.” But GRA leaders regularly call the Georgia Freedom Caucus, MA-GA Georgia, Georgia Right to Life, Truth in Education, the John Birch Society and other groups our “partner organizations” because they share some or all of our principles. This terminology denotes partnership in mission, not a financial partnership, and certainly not legal controlling interest of these organizations.
“Guilt by association is an intellectually lazy and legally empty argument,” said Banks Wise, the current GRA Treasurer. “I’m grateful for our legal representation in Catherine and Alex, and hope their excellent skills and committed advocacy for liberty & justice can stop being wasted on this bad faith inquisition.”
To legitimize their complaint against the GRA, the Ethics Commission needs to explain the following:
⁃ How they believe GRA Officers could have known what donations and expenditures were not being reportedly accurately by the GRA-PAC ⁃ How they believe GRA officers should have obtained financial data for the GRA PAC, when the GRA PAC maintained a separate bank account ⁃ What motion they believe GRA officers could have made to remedy the situation and compel action to ensure accurate filings for the GRA PAC, when the GRA PAC was a separate entity that is not mentioned in GRA Bylaws
“The individual who was legally responsible for the activities of the GRA PAC, as an organization, organized under the laws of Georgia – that person is responsible for filing disclosure reports and for correctly filing as an Independent Committee, a Political Action Committee, or perhaps as both,” said Bernard.
To hold someone responsible for actions, implies that they had the mechanism to perform that action.
“… That lack of a legal or factual mechanism we believe is what bars any further proceedings against the Georgia Republican Assembly,” said Bernard.
Another example of a lack of coordination by the GRA, Inc. and the PAC was seen in the responses by the two separate entities to the hearing itself. To the surprise of officers of the GRA, it was announced for the first time Thursday that attorneys for Frost and the GRA-PAC conceded Baywall’s reasonable grounds to investigate possible failures to comply with laws, but the GRA did not concede anything. Indeed, the GRA officers present at the hearing were entirely unaware of Frost’s decision until it was announced during the meeting.
The State Ethics Commission has 30 days to refer the case to the Office of State Administrative Hearings (OSAH) where it will be heard again.
Senator Moore’s State Senate District encompasses a substantial portion of MTG’s congressional constituency and he has won re-election by large margins. In 2024, for example, he won the Republican primary by over 70% of the vote, and then won re-election in the general election by a 78.8% margin. He also maintains a strong, loyal base of grassroots support as a result of his principled voting record and numerous strong stands at the state capitol.
MTG has also been cherished in her district for being assertive in advancing Republican principles, and it is likely that the voters in her district will look for a successor with similar characteristics, which would provide Colton with an advantage. However, a competitive congressional campaign would require significant fundraising to ensure he can effectively communicate his message to voters.
Blake Elsberry
If Colton decides to run for Congress, there will likely be a rapid scramble to fill his Senate seat. Former Chattooga County Commissioner Blake Elsberry‘s name has been floated as a possible candidate, as has State Rep. Mitchell Horner from Catoosa. Undoubtedly other less-principled candidates will also jump into the fray. Elsberry developed a strong reputation as a principled county commissioner during his tenure — even when those decisions came at personal or political cost.
The GRA intends to assist our local chapters in the 14th District to organize a Candidate Forum & Regional Endorsement Convention shortly after candidate qualifying. So stay tuned.
Ringgold, GA — Yesterday, the Judge David K. Smith of the Superior Court of Catoosa County contradicted the Federal 11th Circuit Court decision issued a few months ago, which upheld the Catoosa GOP’s “freedom of association” lawsuit. In 2024, the Catoosa Republican Party attempted to deny four commissioners a place on their primary ballot, due to those commissioners’ reputation for opposing and not implementing core Republican principles — such as supporting low taxes, allowing backyard chickens on private property, protecting medical freedom, and not endorsing Democrats. They set a very low bar of mainstream Republican positions, and politely denied candidates who didn’t meet that minimum standard.
Click to watch the video.
The attorneys representing the Catoosa GOP.
“While it is disappointing that the state court decision completely ignores the recent related federal 11th Circuit Court of Appeals decision that clearly recognizes the constitutional issues at play, we look forward to continued appellate review that accurately recognizes the rights of volunteer-run political parties to enforce their platform on behalf of busy citizens and not be forced by government to cover for insider wealthy interests deceiving voters,” said GRA Chairman Alex Johnson, one of the attorneys representing Catoosa GOP.
Judge Smith is a retired judge from Bartow County who was brought into this case because all four judges over Lookout Mountain Judicial Circuit recused themselves.
Judge Smith’s order went so far as to state: “… there was no legal basis for the behavior of the Catoosa Republican Party” and issued a judgment against several members of the Catoosa GOP, requiring them to pay the legal fees of the four County Commissioners.
“The Supreme Court has explained that the First Amendment’s ‘freedom to join together in furtherance of common political beliefs necessarily presupposes the freedom to identify the people who constitute the association,’ Tashjian v. Republican Party of Conn., 479 U.S. 208, 214 (1986) (internal quotation marks omitted), and ‘to limit the association to those people only,’ Democratic Party of U.S. v. Wisconsin ex rel. La Follette, 450 U.S. 107, 122 (1981). In other words, ‘a corollary of the right to associate is the right not to associate.’ Cal. Democratic Party v. Jones, 530 U.S. 567, 574 (2000).
Regarding the right not to associate, the U.S. Supreme Court “has recognized that the inclusion of persons unaffiliated with a political party may seriously distort its collective decisions—thus impairing the party’s essential functions—and that political parties may accordingly protect themselves from intrusion by those with adverse political principles.” La Follette, 450 U.S. at 122 (quotation marks omitted). And generally “a [s]tate, or a court, may not constitutionally substitute its own judgment for that of the [p]arty.” Id. at 123–24.
We have recognized that a political party’s right to advance the shared political beliefs of its members may include the right not to associate with candidates on a primary ballot. (Underlining added.)
Catoosa Republicans activists supporting the freedom of association
With such overt clarity from the U.S. Supreme Court on this issue, it is shocking that a state level court would issue an order so contradictory to this legal precedent. You know, Stare Decisisand all that.
However, it is not entirely unexpected that the Federal Court might be more neutral and objective about Catoosa GOP’s case, since the Federal judiciary is not beholden to Governor Brian Kemp nor are they as closely connected to some of the state legislators whose political careers might be in jeopardy if the Georgia Republican Party began exercising its freedom of association rights more regularly. Make no mistake – Georgia politicians are watching this case very closely.
Advocates for Catoosa GOP’s freedom of association exercise on the primary ballot speak to the press.
The 11th Circuit opinion said: “…we see no reason why a county-level party, and its constituent members, would not also enjoy the right to freedom of association and the right to identify those who constitute the local party based on political beliefs. See Id. The court also suggested that the Duke cases are different because they involved a presidential primary where the party ‘enjoyed substantial discretionary power’ to select candidates, but Georgia state law ‘provides no discretion for a county party to deny qualification to candidates based on substantive concerns.’ See O.C.G.A. § 21-2-153. That state law may prevent the Catoosa GOP from excluding primary candidates for ideological reasons, though, simply shows that its right to freedom of association has been burdened. It does not negate the right. After all, a political party’s constitutional right to exclude, ‘central to its freedom of association,’ is not derived from state law. Wash. State Grange v. Wash. State Republican Party, 552 U.S. 442, 445 (2008).” (Underlining added.)
The far-left Atlanta Journal Constitution newspaper and some Establishment-leaning GOP activists were quick to report on this unfavorable ruling, even though they seemed to ignore the 11th Circuit (Federal) Court’s opinion when it was handed down on June 12th, probably because they didn’t like the outcome of that decision.
Fake Republican politicians don’t like being held accountable to a written platform. Politicians and Debbie Dooley are terrified that grassroots Republicans like you just might click the donate button and enable Catoosa GOP to continue this legal fight where SCOTUS precedent is so clearly on their side.
This aggressive decision from the Catoosa Superior Court is ripe for appeal, and Catoosa GOP members stand resolute, despite the fear-mongering efforts of their critics. They are bolstered by the knowledge that real, principled, grassroots Republicans across Georgia are behind them.
Will you pitch in $10 or $20 to help the Catoosa GOP team as they trailblaze for all Georgia Republicans? You can donate here to support the Catoosa GOP’s ongoing legal battle for freedom of association:
Atlanta, GA — Today GRA-endorsed State Senator Colton Moore (R-Dade) appeared in court again to appeal the Fulton court decision from March to not arrest the man who grabbed, pushed, and knocked him to the floor at the state capitol.
The unforgettable incident occured on January 16th when Randall Keith Williams, staff member of the Speaker of the House, unlawfully blocked Moore from entering the State House chamber for the Governor’s State of the State address, under orders from State Speaker Jon Burns. In June the Georgia Republican Party state convention delegates voted to censure Speaker Burns for this action.
Moore was represented in court Thursday by attorneys Catherine Bernard (GRA Senior NFRA Director) and Alex Johnson (GRA Chairman) from the law firm Bernard & Johnson.
Fulton Superior Court Judge Williams heard the arguments and watched a video recording of the attack of Mr. Williams against Sen. Moore in the state capitol hallway.
Click to watch War Room Georgia’s report on the hearing.
“If this were two people who had no connection to the [State] Capitol whatsoever, there would still be a crime,” said attorney Catherine Bernard at the hearing, “if one of them was seeking to walk into a place, and the other one decided ‘I don’t want to let you get in here so I’m going to tackle and assault you.’ Not [in] a place that he had any authority over whatsoever – that still would have been a crime!”
The decision to ban Senator Moore from the House chamber followed his remarks in March 2024 opposing a resolution to honor the late Speaker David Ralston (R-Ellijay) and to name a building after him. From the well of the State Senate, Senator Moore echoed a point long emphasized by the GRA: that Speaker Ralston’s record included a pattern of misconduct and abuse of power unworthy of praise. He argued that Ralston should not be elevated as a model for other politicians to emulate.
Williams had previously been employed by Speaker David Ralston, and so he may have taken personal offense to Moore’s words.
“[T]he fact that we are dealing with someone who was duly elected to perform his duties, as a member of the Georgia legislature who was on his way to the legislative session, an activity that is specifically protected in the Georgia Constitution as well as Georgia statute, that provides an additional concern of having someone in that position being subjected to political violence to prevent them from participating in the session. … The rule of law does not allow government employees to assault and attack people who are participating in their duties as elected officials in the Georgia legislature.”
Click to watch the entire video of the court hearing on appeal.
GRA Members were appalled by the violent treatment of Senator Moore, and many GOP county and district organizations expressed their outrage in resolutions passed during the 2025 conventions.
What message will it send if there are no consequences for the person who shoved a peaceful Senator to the floor? What assurance do Georgia voters have that they will not be similarly denied representation the next time someone wants to prevent a legislator from entering The People’s House?
Judge Williams will announce her decision about the appeal in the coming weeks, and GRA members eagerly await the outcome.
We’re thrilled to announce that our 2025 GRA Officer Election State Convention will be held in the territory of the Northwest Georgia Republican Assembly chapter — home to the courageous leaders of the Catoosa County GOP who have been taking bold action to ensure only true Republicans run on the Primary ballot. We hope you’ll join us for this exciting event!
We will hear from a panel about Effective Citizen Lobbying, and vote on elections for half of our Executive Committee officers. Learn “How to Follow the Money.” The panel will feature practical skills for activists such as:
– How to look up campaign disclosures
– How to navigate the GA legislature’s website and legislative calendar
– How to find a bill and see how your legislator votedn
– How to discover who works for the political industry
This presentation is designed to help you hone your skills and make a bigger impact on the Georgia legislature.
Everyone is welcome to register and to attend the convention, learn from the panel, and share a meal, but only GRA members will be eligible to vote. Registration also includes a boxed Chick-fil-A lunch.
We will have the opportunity to discuss and vote on possible endorsements in pending special elections across the state, on resolutions, and on rules changes as well. Since amending the bylaws in 2023, now half of the GRA Executive Committee officers are elected in a staggered fashion every two years. This year the following offices are up for election:
GRA President
Junior GRA NFRA Director
GRA 2nd Vice President
GRA 3rd Vice President
GRA Treasurer
Remember that under the GRA Bylaws, a person must be approved as a GRA member at least 30 days before a convention in order to be eligible to vote. If you know someone who would like to apply to join the GRA, be sure to encourage them do so early enough to ensure they can get approved before November 6th! Our volunteer new membership team works hard to ensure new members share our principles, and vetting can sometimes take up to two weeks. So we recommend new members wanting to attend the convention and vote should submit their applicationthis week.
Many dedicated grassroots volunteers are working hard to get out the vote for the Public Service Commission races on November 4th. Come celebrate their efforts, enjoy great fellowship, and savor some mouthwatering barbecue with the Cobb County Republican Assembly chapter!
All patriots are welcome to join us for this fun social BBQ event where we will be celebrating our hard work & watch the returns for Public Service Commission races! There is no cost to attend, but we do need folks to pre-register so we have an accurate head count.
As per the rules of the Cheatham Community Center, no alcoholic beverages will be provided, but we will have a variety of other drinks available and freebarbecue to enjoy!
• Address: 3702 Ernest W Barrett Pkwy SW, Marietta, GA 30064 • Date: Tuesday, November 4th • Time: 6:00pm to 9:00pm
Jerry Ramsey, the 2nd Vice President of the Cobb County Republican Assembly, is the primary coordinator for this barbecue. As many know, Jerry’s Election Night parties are legendary. If you have questions about the event, please reach out to Jerry.
DON’T FORGET TO VOTE FOR FITZ JOHNSON & TIM ECHOLS FOR PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSIONER!
Regardless of where you live in Georgia, you are eligible to vote in the state-wide Public Service Commissioner elections going on right now! Early voting has started, and Election Day is Tuesday, November 4th!
Early poll reporting shows that so far Democrat voting exceeds Republican voting in this race. It is imperative that we get as many of our fellow Republicans to go to the polls and vote for the Republican nominees in this important election. Democrats are eager to impose the same kinds of “Green New Deal” policies in Georgia as they have in states like California — which will wreck jobs and cause energy costs to skyrocket!
Make sure your Republican friends and family all remember to vote!
