Blog

All Blog Posts

Judge Declares GRA Innocent of Baseless Ethics Complaint

Judge Declares GRA Innocent of Baseless Ethics Complaint

Atlanta, GA — Today, Judge Dominic Capraro at the State Office of Administrative Hearings released a decision that all allegations that the Georgia Republican Assembly and GRA-PAC broke the law are unfounded. Both organizations are innocent of the ethics commission’s frivolous complaint.

The decision stated: “In accordance with the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of law, the Court finds that the Respondents are not in violation of the Act as alleged in the Commission’s Statement of Matters Asserted and, therefore, no sanction is due.”

GRA Chairman Alex Johnson, who is also an attorney, stated: ”It is standard practice for the paid political industry and spineless politicians to try to silence effective volunteers that are trying to hold them accountable. We are glad Judge Capraro was able to see through this and reach the correct outcome in this matter.”

On May 13th, Georgia Republican Assembly NFRA Director & attorney Catherine Bernard represented the GRA in the hearing for the complaint against the now terminated GRA-PAC. The State Ethics Commission previously added the GRA Inc., the membership organization, to the complaint suggesting that the membership organization was one-in-the-same with the GRA-PAC which is not true.

Cath01
Attorney Catherine Bernard cross-examines Timothy Baywall at the hearing.

Timothy Baywal, staff attorney for the Georgia Ethics Commission, was the primary witness and after Bernard’s brilliant cross-examination, he had to walk back his position from last December and thoroughly contradicted the legacy media’s narrative.

“It was never my position that they were trying to pump dark money into elections,” Baywall testified under oath.

“I don’t think anybody was trying to do anything illegal or unlawful,” said Baywall.

Baywall admitted on the witness stand that GRA-PAC’s expenditures were in fact disclosed to the State Ethics Commission.

“All of these were disclosed in GRA-PAC filings. I was never claiming they weren’t disclosed. They were disclosed improperly,” said Baywall.

The Judge’s decision reveals that expenditures of the GRA PAC were not disclosed improperly, as Baywall alleged, because the statutory definition of an independent committee is an entity which is explicitly “not a Political Action Committee” (O.C.G.A. § 21-5-3(15) (2025)). Judge Capraro found that, since both entities “do not meet the definition of an independent committee, they cannot be considered to be in violation of Georgia Code Section 21-5-34(f), and no sanction is authorized.”

Cath02
Bernard discusses case with Baywall and Elizabeth Young during a recess.

This is a huge vindication for the GRA and will come as a massive disappointment to the Establishment operatives in the GOP who thought they smelled blood in the water. An AJC reporter attended only a portion of the hearing, and it is likely this vindication of the GRA will be entirely ignored by the far-left news media who care more about spreading propaganda and casting shade on conservative groups than reporting the truth or correcting their previous articles.

Attorney General Chris Carr, one of the politicians in the Atlanta swamp that GRA members frequently criticize for his inaction on important issues, formally called for the hearing against the GRA and put out a press release before the primary smearing the GRA with allegations that are now proven to be unsubstantiated.

The attorney arguing against the GRA was Elizabeth Young, who works for Carr at the Georgia Department of Law, and who recently represented out-going Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger in the electoral challenge to his candidacy for Governor.

Ethics03
One of the pieces of evidence presented at the hearing.

“We thank the judge for his clear-eyed ruling in this case – a ruling that proves that this case was nothing but a blatant attempt at lawfare against the GRA from the very beginning,” said Dr. Nick Cooper, GRA 1st Vice President. “We’ve shown the political establishment that if they try to intimidate us into silence, we will not back down and capitulate. We will always stand on our principles, and our principles are uncompromising.”

The GRA-PAC dissolved last summer. As long as the GRA PAC was supporting principled, candidates with backbone like Sen. Colton Moore (R-Dade), State Rep. Charlice Byrd (R-Cherokee), and others, the affiliation and support was mutual. The GRA supports numerous organizations with which we have common cause through our newsletters, social media, event sponsorships, and donations.

But the two organizations always maintained separate bank accounts and governance, and it is important to note that while the membership organization previously donated to the GRA-PAC, the GRA-PAC did not donate to the membership organization.

The GRA has not hesitated to call this complaint against them political harassment ever since the five-member body of the State Ethics Commission which employees Baywal and which referred this complaint for a hearing includes three members appointed by the Governor, one appointed by the State Senate Committee on Assignments, and one appointed by the State Speaker of the House. These appointees are ultimately beholden to the very political Establishment that GRA members frequently expose and are working to replace.

One of the facts revealed in Mr. Baywall’s testimony was that former Cobb GOP Chairman, Jason Shepherd, who was the attorney that originally helped incorporate the GRA-PAC, visited Baywall’s office to meet with him about the complaint against the GRA and that Shepherd had submitted emails as “evidence” to bait the Ethics Commission with the complaint. He also made statements to the media parroting Baywall’s allegations against his former client — the GRA-PAC and suggesting wrongdoing on part of the GRA.

We are grateful that, in spite of relentless attacks and smear attempts, the members of the Georgia Republican Assembly can continue our important mission and protect Georgia families from the harmful policies of Democrats — and Democrats disguised as Republicans. We remain the “Republican wing of the Republican Party.”

Shelley Wynter Endorses Ossoff, Reveals He’s a Fake “Republican” Pundit

Shelley Wynter Endorses Ossoff, Reveals He’s a Fake “Republican” Pundit

Mableton, GA — WSB radio talk show host Shelley Wynter, who has been characterized as a “conservative” by some, and who has been welcomed at Republican Party meetings in metro-Atlanta over the last few years, and even vaunted as something of an authority on Republican politics, announced that he was endorsing radical far Left Democrat Jon Ossoff for re-election to the U.S. Senate. This endorsement came shortly after Congressman Mike Collins (R- District 10) defeated Governor Kemp’s favored candidate and former football coach Derek Dooley in the primary runoff to win the Republican nomination.

Wyntr2

“I’m here to tell you live on the radio that I am Team Ossoff for the rest of the summer and I will do everything I can possible on this show to get you re-elected,” Wynter said, following his broadcast conversation with Ossoff. “I see re-elections as a job interview, and in my humble opinion, I’ve seen nothing from Senator Jon Ossoff that requires me to say you’re fired from the job.”

Did you know that Democrat Jon Ossoff’s record is worse than Bernie Sanders’ record?

According to The Freedom Index, which rates all Congressmen and state legislators in the nation by how well their votes adhere to constitutional principles, current Congressman Mike Collins has a lifetime voting score of 87 percent.

In contrast to that, Democrat U.S. Senator Jon Ossoff has a voting record of 3 percent. Not 30 percent. Not 13 percent. Just the single digit figure of 3 percent!

Bern
Bernie Sanders

To give you an idea of just how thoroughly bad that is: That’s even worse than U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders (D-Vermont), long considered the standard of the far-Left Marxist wing of the Democrat Party, who’s scored a lifetime evaluation of as much as 26 percent! So Bernie got 23% more points than Ossoff. You have to be pretty bad to be worse than Bernie Sanders.

But Ossoff’s poor policy-making is lost on Shelley Wynter, who went so far as to proclaim on the air that “everything [Ossoff] you’re doing, everything you’ve done, I agree with. I have some minor disagreements on some smaller issues, but on the big things, I’m on your team.”

Everything? You agree with “everything”? How can someone say that and still be considered a “conservative” by anyone in the state? This is another shocking betrayal of the principles Republicans believe in and for which we fight.

OSSOFF’S RECORD

Ossoff
Democrat Jon Ossoff

How has Ossoff been voting that earned him the lousy 3% lifetime score? How about, for example, voting against protecting women’s sports so that only biological females could compete in women’s sports? That’s pretty low-hanging fruit. But in March of 2025, U.S. Senator Jon Ossoff voted against that bill, and Republican nominee Mike Collins voted in favor of it.

Does Shelley Wynter, then, oppose only biological women competing in women’s sports? This is a common sense Republican principle that recognizes God’s design and basic biology.

But that’s just one example. Ossoff is on record repeatedly voting against lowering the deficit, against cutting federal government subsidies (corporate welfare), and against reducing environmental regulations. He voted in favor of sending taxpayer money to foreign nations. He voted against legislation that would have protected the lives of babies who survive an attempted abortion. He has voted in favor of surveillance of American citizens, but against auditing the Federal Reserve. He voted in favor of mask mandates. He voted in favor of forced vaccines. He voted in favor of more federal gun control. He voted in favor of Ketanji Brown Jackson’s confirmation to the U.S. Supreme Court — arguably the most woke Justice on the bench!

The receipts are all here.

Read More
Ten GOP Delegates File Lawsuit to Protect Integrity of Republican Party

Ten GOP Delegates File Lawsuit to Protect Integrity of Republican Party

Atlanta, GA – On Thursday of last week, ten Republican delegates from last year’s state convention filed a lawsuit for a declaratory judgment against the GA GOP for violating its own rules of party governance when they allowed Brad Raffensperger to qualify as a candidate on the Republican ballot contrary to the directive of the 2025 Georgia Republican Party convention delegates.

The complaint states: “Plaintiffs do not seek to alter any election result, compel any government action, or regulate the GRP from without. They seek only a declaration that resolutions duly passed by the GRP State Convention are binding upon the GRP State Executive Committee under the GRP’s own Rules; and that the Executive Committee’s certification of Brad Raffensperger in direct defiance of such a resolution was therefore void as ultra vires.” (emphasis added)

Brndyn
Brandyn James

“We are not seeking any monetary damages from the GA GOP,” said Brandyn James, one of the plaintiffs. “We merely want to ensure this situation doesn’t occur again in the future and a declaratory judgment would be a statement from a Judge warning the GA GOP that they have to follow their own bylaws, and cannot dismiss clear instructions from the convention delegates!”

The written motion passed by the body directed that the Georgia Republican Party “shall not qualify, allow to be qualified, or take any action to allow Brad Raffensperger to qualify as a Republican or run for any elected office as a Republican.”

“The convention said ‘no.’ The Party did it anyway,” said Alex Johnson, attorney and GRA Chairman. “Whatever one thinks about Raffensperger, who thankfully lost in the primary, that institutional problem should concern every Republican.

The point is larger than one candidate.

“The convention was supposed to be the moment when the Republican grassroots spoke with authority,” Alex continued. “But when its decision became inconvenient, its vote was treated like a public opinion survey.”

Harv
Harvey Wysong

Some have tried to characterize this effort as being disloyal and a waste of party resources for GOP leadership to have to defend themselves. But the delegates suing said that there would be no need for the suit to “distract” or “eat up party resources” if GA GOP Chairman Josh McKoon was quick to simply admit he was wrong. “If Josh settles by acknowledging he broke the rules, apologizes, and promises to comply with the rules on this point in the future,” said delegate Harvey Wysong, “then it will all be over. We need to clear this issue up now!”

The plaintiffs have made it clear they are not trying to harm the party at all. 

“We care very much about the GA GOP and want to see the party be successful. We know the success of our party depends on it operating with integrity,” said Brandyn James. 

The complaint reads: 

“As a private political party, the GRP possesses a First Amendment right of politicalassociation, including the right to determine its own candidate selection criteria and the right to exclude potential candidates. See California Democratic Party v. Jones, 530 U.S. 567 (2000).

“The Binding Resolution is an expression of the GRP’s associational right; a determination that Brad Raffensperger does not have the faith and confidence of the GRP.”

Raff
Brad Raffensperger

Brandyn, Harvey, and the other plaintiffs believe that this effort is necessary and argue that, if successful, it will benefit the party by prohibiting Brad Raffensperger from qualifying for office as a Republican if he were to run for an office in the next election cycle. They also believe, if successful, it would encourage attendance in future state GOP conventions, since many delegates felt defrauded and disillusioned by the party’s actions contradicting the convention delegates. 

“Why travel, pay the registration fee, and spend a whole day participating in a convention where the party officers can just override decisions they disagree with?” said James.

The other plaintiffs who have joined onto this action include Brian Parker from Banks County, Neal Howell from Dade County, Angela Rubino from Floyd County, William Freeman from DeKalb County, Renee Parker from Lowndes County, Michael Opitz from Cobb County, David Nahabedian from Walker County, and Norine Cantor from Hall County. We commend each of them for their integrity and courage.

A declaratory judgment would provide the clarity Republicans need as they evaluate whether or not to spend their own personal resources to attend another GOP convention. 

Givesend

If you would like to support this effort and help the plaintiffs cover their legal costs, you can donate to their GiveSendGo here: https://www.givesendgo.com/stopraffy/. If you care about the Georgia Republican Party’s future growth and success, would you consider donating a small amount to preserve the integrity of our party? Every donation bolsters and encourages these courageous plaintiffs, and reminds them they are not alone. The grassroots stands behind them!

Legislature Poised to Postpone QR Code Removal, Adds Hand-Count Requirement in Compromise Bill

Legislature Poised to Postpone QR Code Removal, Adds Hand-Count Requirement in Compromise Bill

Atlanta, GA — Saturday the State Senate took up S.B. 3EX, a bill for the special session designed to “kick the can” on the July 1st requirement to remove QR codes from Georgia’s election systems. Election integrity advocates swarmed the halls at the state capitol and sent text message blasts to their legislators, urging them to oppose the bill.

Captl

The bill extends the deadline for addressing the state’s current voting system until January 1, 2028, creates a committee to recommend a new electronic voting system, and expands Risk-Limiting Audits (RLAs) to additional races.

Georgia taxpayers are still paying off the $107 million, 20-year bond for the existing Dominion system that failed to meet the standards set in the authorizing legislation, HB 316, in 2019. The new bill sets the stage for yet another expensive electronic voting system recommendation while the state has not delivered what voters have repeatedly demanded: hand-marked paper ballots! In the May Republican Primary, 90% of the voters expressed support for hand-marked paper ballots. Republicans in the legislature should listen to what Republican voters want.

IMG 3623 1024x768
The roll call vote on the Senators who voted for & against Dolezal’s amendment.

When the State Senate convened on Saturday, it seemed “the powers that be” had already determined that S.B. 3EX would be passed into law. So State Senator Greg Dolezal (R-Forsyth), the Republican nominee for Lt. Governor, proposed an amendment that would at least allow election-integrity advocates to salvage something positive from this terrible legislation. It was a trade off.

Dolezal’s amendment requires a full hand count for at least the top two races on the ballot.

This was considered a win by many because conducting a hand count, where a human eye is reading the actual words on the ballot, eliminates the concern about the QR code potentially altering the totals. But only for the top two races. The amendment passed, as did the bill, and it will transfer for consideration to the State House on Monday.

The House Governmental Affairs Committee is scheduled to hear S.B. 3 EX Monday morning at 10am at room 606 in the Coverdell Legislative Office Building.

Samc
Sam Carnline with “Georgians for Truth”

Some hailed the passage of the amended bill as a major victory, because this would be the first time that the Georgia Senate voted to require a hand count of ballots in state law. If S.B. 3 EX is destined to pass into law, then it is certainly better for it to pass with this amendment than without it. However, others have criticized the compromise and emphasized the hefty and unnecessary concessions this bill makes that would prevent our elections from being secured.

“SB 3EX is another delay dressed up as reform,” said activist Sam Carnline from Grady County. “Georgia voters deserve hand-marked paper ballots and a full hand count of every race to verify tabulation before certification. Decentralizing the process by bringing it back to the people at the local precinct is the only way to restore trust. We will not accept another expensive electronic system while we are still paying for one that never worked.”

Congratulations to Our Victorious Endorsed Candidates in the Runoff!

Congratulations to Our Victorious Endorsed Candidates in the Runoff!

Yesterday, GRA-endorsed state-wide candidates Greg Dolezal and Mike Collins won a decisive victory in their Republican Primary Runoff Elections. We are pleased to report that nine of the GRA’s endorsed candidates for public office have won their Republican nominations this year. Both Dolezal and Collins received support from the GRA due to their superior voting records supporting the Republican platform in the past.

Senator Greg Dolezal won the nomination as the Republican Party’s candidate for Lt. Governor, and he will face Democrat Josh McLaurin, who has been a very out-spoken Democrat in the State Senate for the last several years. Collins will face Democrat Jon Ossoff in the U.S. Senate race in November.

Richard Jordan Charges Cherokee Election Workers with Legal Infractions and Political Retaliation

Richard Jordan Charges Cherokee Election Workers with Legal Infractions and Political Retaliation

Cumming, GA – On June 4th, at the State Election Board Meeting, North Metro Republican Assembly Chapter President Richard Jordan filed notice of a criminal complaint against Cherokee County Board of Elections for coordinated efforts of voter intimidation and political retaliation against election integrity activists. 

Jord01
Richard Jordan delivering petitions

Richard Jordan is joined in the complaint by Truth Seekers, an informal coalition of election integrity advocates based out of Cherokee County. This complaint follows a series of unethical actions and alleged violations of election law on the part of Cherokee County elections, as well as a frivolous complaint brought against Richard Jordan for merely asking questions of trained poll workers about his ballot’s QR code. That complaint was filed by Cherokee Elections Director Ann Dover and sought felony referral for Jordan but was dismissed and Jordan found innocent by the State Election Board on April 15th

“ ‘We the People’ possess the constitutional right to vote, freely express concerns regarding election procedures, and petition government officials for redress of grievances,” said Jordan. “This statement together with a litany of alleged felony and misdemeanor infractions of the law summarize factual allegations and legal issues arising from events occurring in the Cherokee County Elections Office and at a Cherokee County polling location while interacting with election officials and law enforcement.”

Richard Jordan asserts that he and other election integrity advocates were singled out for scrutiny and intimidation, that election officials falsely characterized his conduct as criminal trespass, and that false and misleading information was provided to law enforcement. Jordan argues that there is an pattern of targeting electors who lawfully ask questions and participate at Board of Elections meetings.

He also cites a letter from Elections Director Ann Dover in which she encouraged paid government employees to advocate in opposition of SB 568, a Republican bill mandating the use of paper ballots. Jordan believes this violated Dover’s oath of office to serve in an unbiased manner. The bill was sponsored by Republican Senator Greg Dolezal, now the Republican nominee for Lieutenant Governor.

Read More
The Consultants Think You’re an Idiot. Don’t Prove Them Right

The Consultants Think You’re an Idiot. Don’t Prove Them Right

Georgia Republicans are being flooded with the best campaign money can buy. But money can buy ads, consultants, mailers, and slogans. It cannot buy a record.

I have been interested in politics for as long as I can remember. I have been involved in the actual Georgia Republican Party organization since 2009 — about seventeen years now, in addition to studying politics in college, before law school.

That is long enough to notice a few patterns.

There is the general public — We the People — who usually vote for the party that most closely reflects their values. They may not attend conventions. They may not read every platform plank. They may not know every county chairman or district officer. But they generally know which direction they want the country to go, and in November they vote for the nominee of the party that best represents them, and that party, statistically, tends to be the same one year after year.

Then there are the grassroots volunteers.

These are the people who show up for free. They go to county meetings. They knock doors. They read legislation. They fight over rules. They hold elected officials accountable. They care about whether candidates actually believe and enact what they say. They care about the platform. They care about promises. They care about whether politicians remember the party that sent them once they get into office.

And then there is the paid political industry.

That industry is not primarily made up of statesmen, philosophers, constitutional scholars, or public servants. It’s not made up of people who understand political philosophy, or policy, or history. It is made up of people who say they 1know how to win campaigns. That is a different skill.

They know how to poll test a phrase.

They know how to cut a flattering ad.

They know how to buy enough television time to create a rags to riches story to make a stranger feel familiar.

They know how to make a candidate with no record sound like a movement.

They know how to make a man with a voting record look worse than a man with no voting record at all.

And most importantly, they know this: if they spend enough money, repeat the same message enough times, and flood enough mailboxes, a certain number of voters will eventually believe whatever they are told.

That is the whole business model.

The paid political industry does not need you to be informed. It needs you to be impressionable.

It does not need you to remember what someone has done. It needs you to react to what someone’s ad says this week.

It does not need a candidate with a history. In fact, a blank slate is far easier to sell. A blank slate has no bad votes, no hard choices, no public record, no years of decisions to defend. A blank slate can be whatever the consultants say it is.

That is why this governor’s race matters. …

Click here to read more on Alex’s SubStack.

Save the Okefenokee!

Save the Okefenokee!

Waycross, GA — South Georgians are sounding the alarm! Before leaving office, the Biden administration decided to hand over control of the 700-mile Okefenokee Swamp to the United Nations via UNESCO. They want to designate it a UNESCO “World Heritage Site” but that designation would cede US control over our own land.

This past weekend GRA President Nathaniel Darnell and GRA Junior NFRA Director Abigail Darnell joined with Travis Sanctuary, Brooks Strickland, and The John Birch Society chapter in Waycross at the park, where they are sounding the alarm and working with CFACT (Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow) urging the Department of the Interior to reject this proposal. There is a ground-swell of people in the community concerned about this issue.

“There is zero reason we should just hand over any influence or control of any Georgia land to the United Nations!” said Nathaniel.

A CFACT press release stated: “All three counties bordering Okefenokee Swamp have voted against UNESCO coming into their backyard. Public lands access and property rights would be infringed if this action proceeds.”

Click to watch the video and learn more.

“Global authority is dangerous because it quickly can become tyrannical and the people are far removed from the decision maker(s),” said Abigail.

OKF 02 1024x872
Screenshot

Those concerned about this issue were encouraged to follow Americans for the Okefenokee on Facebook. That group issued the following statement: “UNESCO World Heritage is a Trojan Horse utilizing the program as a vehicle for a soft-law approach with mechanisms such as blacklisting, surveillance, and the pursuit of Outstanding Universal Value to influence national policies and undermine sovereignty for the advancement of universal international ideological standards often at odds with local community values.”

While proponents of the measure maintain that a World Heritage designation is merely an honorary label that would boost tourism for the site, Americans for the Okefenokee are quick to point out that UNESCO acknowledges that a World Heritage designation includes “restrictions.” It is those restrictions and the potential for abuse of UN authority that has locals concerned.

If a global entity has authority to impose laws and restrictions on Americans and American land, then claiming the United States still owns the land is meaningless. America might have ownership in name only.

Ballot questions in nearby Ware County indicate that around 78% of voters oppose the UNESCO bid.

Sanctuary and his team distributed T-Shirts protesting the takeover with the phrase: “Just say no to commUNism”!

“Reagan and Trump took us out of UNESCO,” said the representative for the JBS Waycross chapter, “but then their successors added us back in! The thing is that when Biden added the U.S. back into UNESCO, the U.S. had to pay back-pay on dues for all the years we were out under Trump! A lot of people don’t realize these things are going on.”

Sadly, RINO Congressman Buddy Carter helped to promote this encroachment on American land. This one of the reasons the GRA endorsed Mike Collins, and not Buddy Carter, in the Republican Primary for U.S. Senate.

To learn more about this issue, read the press release here: https://www.cfact.org/…/cfact-releases-video-report-on…/

Seven GRA-Endorsed Candidates Victorious While Others Advance to a Runoff

Seven GRA-Endorsed Candidates Victorious While Others Advance to a Runoff

Seven GRA-endorsed candidates won their Republican nomination out-right last night in the Tuesday Primary. Three state-wide candidates will advance to a runoff.

GRA members have worked hard over the last several weeks to promote these endorsed candidates, door-knocking, phone-banking, donating, and sign-waving.

The winners included State Rep. Charlice Byrd (R-Cherokee), Rep. Noelle Kahaian (R-Henry), Congressman Andrew Clyde (R-District 9), Congressional candidate Matt Day (District 2), Congressional candidate Jim Duffie (District 4), Cobb Commissioner Keli Gambrill (District 1), and Fulton County Commissioner Bridget Thorne (District 1). Each of these have distinguished themselves in various ways as they have stood up to pressure from the Establishment and fought for Republican principles. We are proud to support such candidates and see them to victory — even when facing great opposition! They are fighters and they are helping to make “the Republican Party REPUBLICAN again”!

For example, Charlice won in spite of, reportedly, the local Chamber of Commerce recruiting an opponent to run against her and the gambling lobby raising over $1 million for her opponent. Charlice has often had to break ranks with her caucus to vote against the wasteful and even illegal spending in the state budget. She’s taken hits for it, but it has not bothered her. She had voting record of 98% from 2025, and she’s consistently scored in the 90th percentile in office, when her votes are compared to the GAGOP Platform.

Meanwhile, three state-wide candidates came in either first place or second place on Tuesday in crowded fields of Republicans, and so they will advance to a runoff. Current Lt. Governor Burt Jones came in first place in his race of seven candidates. RINO candidates such as Brad Raffensperger and Chris Carr came in third and fourth, so they are thankfully eliminated from the Republican Primary election. But because none of the seven candidate garnered 50% plus one vote, the gubernatorial race goes into a runoff with Burt Jones and billionaire Rick Jackson.

GRArun 1024x1024

State Senator Greg Dolezal (R-Forsyth) came in second place in the race for Lt. Governor behind Senator John F. Kennedy (R-Monroe), and so the two of them will face off in the runoff on June 16th. Dolezal has a vastly superior voting record over Kennedy. Dolezal in 2025 scored 98% (83% vote score plus 76+ sponsorship score) while Kennedy only voted for Republican policy 43% of the time in 2025! Kennedy was also openly hostile towards former State Senator Colton Moore (R-Dade), and has been reported to be the one who called for Moore’s ouster from the Senate Republican Caucus after Moore publicly chastised the Senate for refusing to subpoena Fani Willis years ago.

Congressman Mike Collins (R-District 10) also made it into a runoff with Kemp-backed Derek Dooley. The GRA does not track scorecards for federal offices, but Collins has a lifetime vote score of voting 87% of the time with constitutional principles, according to the Freedom Index. Dooley is a football coach who admitted he did not vote in elections for two decades, including the 2016 and 2020 presidential elections.

Now GRA members will need to knuckle down and help these three remaining endorsed candidates through what is expected to be a brutal primary runoff. The runoff date is June 16th — the day before Governor Kemp has called for a Special Session to begin!

Thank you to all of our members who have made sacrifices and worked tirelessly on campaigns for the betterment of your community.

Stay tuned for ways you can help bring these principled candidates to victory!

Catoosa Primary Voters Want GOP to Block RINOs, Ballot Questions Reveal

Catoosa Primary Voters Want GOP to Block RINOs, Ballot Questions Reveal

Ringgold, GA — On Tuesday, primary voters in Catoosa County voted 77% in favor of having the local Republican Party organization protect the Republican Primary ballot from undercover Democrat candidates.

The question read: “Do you believe that anyone, even closet Democrats, should be able to run on the Republican primary ballots?”

76.82% of Republican voters said, “No.”

This comes after the Catoosa GOP attempted to deny specific commission candidates a place on the primary ballot who had a track record of imposing anti-Republican policies.

Catqjpg 327x1024

In case there was any confusion, Catoosa voters made it abundantly clear when a whopping 85%, 87% and 89% answered “yes” to the following:

11. “Do you want the Republican Party to ensure our candidates for office are for gun rights?”

12. “Do you want the Republican Party to ensure our candidates for office are for lower taxes?”

13. “Do you want the Republican Party to ensure our candidates for office are pro-life?”

Ballot questions like these are non-binding surveys but are used by local and state parties to guage what Republican voters (who never attend party meetings or events) actually think about the issues. Ballot questions are valuable because the results help guide the party, and inform Republican politicians what their constituents want and believe.

“I don’t pay too much attention to local politics, unfortunately, and that’s why I really appreciate the local GOP keeping these people accountable and ensuring that only true Republicans are actually on the ballot,” said Joseph Cochran, a GenX Catoosa voter.

While the Establishment and leftist media suggest that Catoosa GOP’s volunteer leadership team is a radical fringe group who are out of touch with everyday Republican voters, and that primary voters want to do their own personal vetting of all candidates’ ideology, this data proves that three out of four Republican voters in Catoosa county actually want the Republican Party to vet candidates before they are allowed on the Republican ballot.

Alex
Alex Johnson

“What I noticed from reading the answers to the ballot questions,” said GRA Chairman & attorney Alex Johnson, “is that over 76% of Catoosa County Republican voters don’t want anyone who wants to, to be able to run on the Republican Primary ballot, and over 84% of them want the party to ensure candidates are for lower taxes, gun rights, and Prolife.”

They want someone from the party ensuring a candidate meets a minimum standard. They don’t think their selection in the voting booth on primary Election Day is where the Democrats should get eliminated. They want that to occur earlier. They want to walk into the voting booth on primary Election Day and feel confident that they are choosing between two or more people who hold at least a base-level adherence to core Republican ideology.

You might say, they want the Republican party to pre-qualify the options as being “non-Democrat” before that candidate’s name ever appears on the ballot as an option. Lucky for Catoosa voters, this process already exists and it is called “candidate qualification.” This is the process by which the Republican Party serves Republican voters by eliminating rotten apples before dishing up the options to the voters. They file the paperwork with the county and the names of whichever candidates they “qualified” as Republicans.

But this process has been circumvented by the Catoosa Board of Elections and the question continues to be litigated in court.

Does a county party have a right to turn down a candidate? The 11th Circuit court said “yes” because the constitution protects the right to freedom of association.

Catoosa GOP has received significant criticism of their efforts to block specific county commission candidates from the primary ballot when those candidates had a history of supporting anti-Republican policy. For two years the argument was that any person has a right to run and have their name appear on the Republican primary ballot, no matter what they believe, no matter what kind of public record they have, as long as they pay the qualifying fee, and sign their name on the loyalty oath to the party. But in an appalling act of government coercion this year, the Catoosa Board of Elections didn’t even allow the Catoosa GOP to disqualify someone who failed to sign the loyalty oath!

The bottom line is that tests, interviews, and auditions only frighten away weak performers … or fakes. Real Republicans who believe in limited government, low taxes, family values, the right to bear arms, etc., are not scared to sit down and talk about what they believe and are not daunted by a pass or fail examination of their record on public policy. Differences of opinion and approach to public policy exist within the party, and are not disqualifiers, so long as those differences remain within the parameters of base-level Republicanism.