GRA Derangement Syndrome, Part II: “Team Ossoff” and the Unity Fraud
Republicans are allowed to disagree during primaries.¹
They should.
A primary is when Republican voters examine records, compare candidates, challenge weaknesses, debate principles, and select the people they believe should carry the Republican banner into the general election.
But a party cannot function if “unity” means only that grassroots conservatives must support establishment nominees while establishment figures remain free to undermine grassroots nominees.
The 2026 election presents three useful tests:
Mike Collins, whom the GRA endorsed for U.S. Senate.
Greg Dolezal, whom the GRA endorsed for lieutenant governor.
Rick Jackson, whom the GRA did not endorse for governor, but nevertheless wants people to vote for in November, because he’s a Republican.
Together, the three races expose whether unity is truly a principle, or merely a weapon used against one faction of the Republican Party.
THE GRA ENDORSED MIKE COLLINS

The Georgia Republican Assembly (GRA) endorsed Mike Collins during the Republican primary process.
When Republican voters selected Collins as the nominee, the GRA supported him against Democrat Jon Ossoff. The organization lists Collins among its 2026 endorsed candidates and celebrated his runoff victory.
That is what Republican unity looks like:
Fight during the primary.
Accept the voters’ decision.
Support the Republican nominee.
Defeat the Democrat.
Some of the GRA’s loudest critics chose a different path.
SHELLEY WYNTER CHOOSES “TEAM OSSOFF”
Radio host Shelley Wynter did not merely decline to endorse Mike Collins.
He endorsed Jon Ossoff.

Ossoff’s campaign published the announcement under the headline “Conservative 95.5 WSB Radio Host Shelley Wynter: ‘I Am Team Ossoff.’”
Wynter told Ossoff that he was “Team Ossoff” and promised to use his program to help the Democratic senator win reelection. The Ossoff campaign presented the endorsement as evidence of a Republican defection and a blow to Collins’s effort to unite Republican voters.
The endorsement also received national coverage from USA Today and was amplified by the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee.
Democrats understood its value immediately.
They did not treat it as a meaningless personal preference.
They treated it as campaign material.
WYNTER ATTACKS THE GRA
After the GRA criticized Wynter’s endorsement, Wynter used Facebook to attack the organization:

Read Wynter’s first Facebook response.
Read Wynter’s second Facebook response.
Read the GRA article that prompted the dispute.
The GRA’s criticism was not that anyone possessed a particular genetic trait or immutable characteristic.
The criticism concerned Wynter’s judgment.
The article referenced an earlier incident in which Wynter reportedly praised what a Republican leadership slate “looked like,” rather than emphasizing its members’ accomplishments, qualifications, records, service, or adherence to Republican principles.
Wynter and some of his defenders transformed criticism of identity-based evaluation into criticism of the identities themselves.
Those are not the same thing.
Saying that leaders should be judged by ability and principles rather than genetic traits is not an attack on anyone’s traits.
It is a defense of equal treatment and merit.
ESTABLISHMENT MEDIA PRETENDS NOT TO UNDERSTAND
Wynter was not alone in acting as though the consequences of his endorsement were somehow mysterious. …




